Storytelling toolbox: Three-Act Structure vs. Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu

Structure plays a vital role in storytelling, conveying messages and evoking emotions. While the West has popularized the Three-Act structure, Eastern storytelling traditions offer an alternative: the Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu structure. Below, we explore the benefits of this approach and how it compares to its Western counterpart.

What is Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu?

Originating from East Asia, Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu is a four-part story structure that consists of an Introduction (Ki), Development (Sho), Twist (Ten), and Conclusion (Ketsu). The focus here is not solely on conflict but also on character development, thematic exploration, and narrative flow.

1. Ki (Introduction): Sets the stage, introducing characters and context.

2. Sho (Development): Builds on the foundation, deepening characters and conflicts.

3. Ten (Twist or Climax): Adds an unexpected layer or turn.

4. Ketsu (Conclusion): Ties up loose ends and brings the story together.

Here is an example from our story Mommy Eats Fried Grasshopper:

1. Ki: We introduce the main character, Mahlee, and where she’s from. Setting up her world.

2. Sho: We developed the key differences between the main character and the subject of the problem, her mommy.

3. Ten: The twist is that she is expected to eat something she’s never tried before.

4. Ketsu: We concluded with her becoming more like her mommy and took on the twist presented before her.

Benefits of Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu

1. Subtlety and Nuance: This structure allows for more subtle storytelling. Not every story needs an antagonist or a dramatic climax, and Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu provides the framework to explore quieter, more contemplative narratives.

2. Inclusive Storytelling: Its flexibility makes it ideal for varying narrative forms, including non-linear stories, essays, or even academic arguments.

3. Enhanced Character Exploration: The “Sho” phase allows characters to develop and change without the urgency to rush toward conflict resolution.

4. Narrative Flexibility: The “Ten” or Twist often introduces an unexpected element, offering creative freedom and a fresh perspective on the established narrative.

5. Comprehensive Closure: The “Ketsu” wraps up the story while often looping back to the initial setup, providing a satisfying and holistic conclusion.

The Three-Act Structure: A Quick Overview

Common in Western literature and cinema, the Three-Act structure comprises the Setup, Confrontation, and Resolution. It’s a formula designed around conflict, with a clear antagonist, escalating tension, and a climax where the dispute is resolved.

1. Act 1 (Setup): Introduces characters and sets the stage for conflict.

2. Act 2 (Confrontation): The protagonist faces challenges.

3. Act 3 (Resolution): Climax and resolution, solving the central conflict.

Here is an example of us using the three-act structure in our story A Sticky Mess:

1. Act 1: The young monk is seen carrying heavy water pails he’s collected for the temple

2. Act 2: He has a confrontation with the head of the monastery.

3. Act 3: He learns how to get out of a bad situation.

Benefits of the Three-Act Structure

1. High Stakes and Engagement: The focus on conflict often leads to higher stakes, making for compelling storytelling.

2. Clear Arc: The three-act structure is predictable and easy to follow, making it accessible.

3. Character Development: With conflict at its core, this model often includes significant character development.

Comparing the Two

1. Focus on Conflict vs. Focus on Journey: Western stories, structured around conflict, often drive toward resolution. Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu stories are more about the journey and can be devoid of competition, focusing instead on character development and thematic undertones.

2. Pacing: The Three-Act structure often necessitates faster pacing to reach the climactic resolution, while Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu allows for more gradual development.

3. Cultural Nuances: Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu can better serve stories rooted in Eastern philosophies and traditions, providing a storytelling format that might feel more authentic to those narratives.

4. Versatility: While the Three-Act structure is predominantly found in drama and cinema, Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu is employed in various formats, including essays and comics, showcasing its adaptability. Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu is adaptable and can be applied across various media and genres. Although flexible within its framework, the three-act structure can sometimes be too rigid.

5. Narrative Depth: The unexpected twist in Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu can add a layer of depth not commonly found in the more straightforward three-act structure.

Conclusion

Both structures have their merits and are tools in a writer’s toolbox; choosing between them depends on the story you want to tell. Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu offers a compelling alternative, rich in nuance and flexible in application. As storytelling becomes increasingly global, understanding diverse narrative structures like Ki-Sho-Ten-Ketsu can only enrich the stories we tell and how we connect across cultures.

Let us know which one you favor when writing your stories. What are your thoughts on our examples and descriptions?

Want more storytelling tips and lessons?